| 2012-08-02 05:14:29 utc | jmettraux | kennethkalmer: hello, it's been a while ;-) |
| 2012-08-02 05:14:38 utc | kennethkalmer | jmettraux: ohai! |
| 2012-08-02 05:14:41 utc | kennethkalmer | too long |
| 2012-08-02 05:15:00 utc | kennethkalmer | how are things going in ruote land ? |
| 2012-08-02 05:15:30 utc | jmettraux | going fine, too much activity, cannot take the time to release 2.3.0 |
| 2012-08-02 05:15:34 utc | jmettraux | and you? |
| 2012-08-02 05:16:07 utc | kennethkalmer | in full startup survival mode, too much activity for anything else really |
| 2012-08-02 05:16:28 utc | kennethkalmer | but overall, things are going great |
| 2012-08-02 05:16:43 utc | jmettraux | happy to read that |
| 2012-08-02 05:18:18 utc | kennethkalmer | see the activity on the group has picked up lately |
| 2012-08-02 05:18:22 utc | kennethkalmer | any exciting new users ? |
| 2012-08-02 05:18:44 utc | jmettraux | it seems there are a few, but they don't publicize their usage |
| 2012-08-02 05:18:59 utc | kennethkalmer | aaaah ;) |
| 2012-08-02 05:19:09 utc | jmettraux | one although is visibly appealing: http://www.maestrodev.com/ |
| 2012-08-02 05:19:38 utc | jmettraux | (but there's no mention of ruote there, you only know if you dig the group for info) |
| 2012-08-02 05:20:21 utc | kennethkalmer | epic |
| 2012-08-02 05:20:30 utc | kennethkalmer | perfect fit for ruote |
| 2012-08-02 05:22:45 utc | kennethkalmer | yay, that really is a perfect fit |
| 2012-08-02 05:22:58 utc | kennethkalmer | loved how ruote worked at inX |
| 2012-08-02 05:23:14 utc | jmettraux | is it still there? |
| 2012-08-02 05:23:37 utc | kennethkalmer | yep |
| 2012-08-02 05:23:45 utc | kennethkalmer | they would not survive without it |
| 2012-08-02 05:23:52 utc | kennethkalmer | i mean that in a nice way |
| 2012-08-02 05:24:04 utc | jmettraux | great :-) |
| 2012-08-02 05:24:24 utc | kennethkalmer | that day we went live with ruote + amqp + kit + etc we effectively replaced 4 humans |
| 2012-08-02 05:24:41 utc | kennethkalmer | and then those guys could actually focus on helping clients |
| 2012-08-02 05:24:52 utc | kennethkalmer | instead of ssh-ing into a gazillion servers |
| 2012-08-02 05:25:09 utc | jmettraux | what's great with this story is that those 4 guys didn't lose their job ;-) |
| 2012-08-02 05:25:19 utc | kennethkalmer | exactly! |
| 2012-08-02 05:25:36 utc | kennethkalmer | the extra time allowed them to develop additional skill sets |
| 2012-08-02 05:26:10 utc | kennethkalmer | man, I miss using ruote day to day |
| 2012-08-02 05:26:22 utc | kennethkalmer | sure the next opportunity will come |
| 2012-08-02 05:26:50 utc | jmettraux | what exciting are you doing these days? (apart from watching girls in lace and rollers) |
| 2012-08-02 05:26:57 utc | kennethkalmer | :D |
| 2012-08-02 05:27:26 utc | kennethkalmer | main focus now is tidying up ValuationUP.com for first MVP |
| 2012-08-02 05:27:56 utc | kennethkalmer | essentially crunching income statements and balance sheets of businesses and then giving them insights |
| 2012-08-02 05:28:19 utc | kennethkalmer | comparative insights, benchmarking, and just helping them understand what is going on with their financials |
| 2012-08-02 05:29:14 utc | jmettraux | sounds very cool and rewarding |
| 2012-08-02 05:29:51 utc | kennethkalmer | yep, very excited about it |
| 2012-08-02 05:31:14 utc | kennethkalmer | frontend skills have skyrocketed |
| 2012-08-02 05:31:38 utc | jmettraux | what are you using / have you developed for that? |
| 2012-08-02 05:31:55 utc | kennethkalmer | a lot of the heavy lifting is done with Backbone, most of the app is actually coffeescript |
| 2012-08-02 05:32:01 utc | kennethkalmer | Rails 3 on the back |
| 2012-08-02 05:32:12 utc | kennethkalmer | then Prawn of reports |
| 2012-08-02 05:32:16 utc | jmettraux | :-) |
| 2012-08-02 05:32:42 utc | kennethkalmer | and my favorite so far is using the ruby racer to run the same coffeescript on the server for the reports |
| 2012-08-02 05:33:24 utc | jmettraux | lol |
| 2012-08-02 05:35:00 utc | kennethkalmer | otherwise, iSign.pro is doing ok-ish |
| 2012-08-02 05:35:11 utc | kennethkalmer | but VUP is our main focus atm |
| 2012-08-02 05:35:35 utc | jmettraux | and how is your ski-time? |
| 2012-08-02 05:36:35 utc | jmettraux | and has the ZA internet gotten better? |
| 2012-08-02 05:37:30 utc | kennethkalmer | ski time is few and far between, mostly on carpets, itching to get back on a slope though |
| 2012-08-02 05:37:52 utc | kennethkalmer | the 3 valleys was awesome, ever been there ? |
| 2012-08-02 05:38:05 utc | kennethkalmer | ZA internet is slowly catching up, prices are dropping heavily though |
| 2012-08-02 05:38:23 utc | kennethkalmer | competition is getting fierce, especially from the mobile operators |
| 2012-08-02 05:39:59 utc | jmettraux | no, sorry, I'm not much of a skier, my father tried but I'm one of those non-skiing swiss |
| 2012-08-02 05:41:57 utc | kennethkalmer | well, then try visiting in summer, it is beautiful there |
| 2012-08-02 05:42:33 utc | kennethkalmer | http://www.greenmountainchalets.co.uk/summer.htm |
| 2012-08-02 05:45:31 utc | jmettraux | :-) |
| 2012-08-02 05:55:14 utc | hartog | guten morgen! |
| 2012-08-02 05:56:17 utc | jmettraux | guten Morgen! |
| 2012-08-02 05:57:24 utc | kennethkalmer | goeie more ! |
| 2012-08-02 06:30:58 utc | hartog | jmettraux: in relation to your performance work together with Marco - wouldn't a ruby w/o a RIL play nicer for Ruote? |
| 2012-08-02 06:33:46 utc | jmettraux | hello, what's a RIL? |
| 2012-08-02 06:37:15 utc | hartog | Ruby Interpreter Lock |
| 2012-08-02 06:37:54 utc | hartog | jRuby has no ril, since threads are handled by the jvm |
| 2012-08-02 06:39:01 utc | hartog | or GIL if you like (Global Interpreter Lock) |
| 2012-08-02 06:39:10 utc | jmettraux | yeah, that's what I know |
| 2012-08-02 06:39:54 utc | jmettraux | Marco's initial issue was with too many connections being created (one per thread) |
| 2012-08-02 06:40:50 utc | jmettraux | getting rid of the GIL could help |
| 2012-08-02 06:41:16 utc | jmettraux | but having multiple workers gets around it already |
| 2012-08-02 06:41:49 utc | hartog | ok (was just wondering) |
| 2012-08-02 06:41:50 utc | jmettraux | I have the impression his participant implementations are heavy, now with the no-threading on, they monopolize each a worker |
| 2012-08-02 06:42:06 utc | jmettraux | that's why I'm proposing to bring back some pooled threading |
| 2012-08-02 06:42:19 utc | jmettraux | so that blocked participants just pass |
| 2012-08-02 06:42:56 utc | jmettraux | unfortunately, I have no access to his system, I cannot see for myself how it happens |
| 2012-08-02 06:43:04 utc | jmettraux | he should log and analyze |
| 2012-08-02 06:43:24 utc | hartog | We all should! |
| 2012-08-02 06:43:29 utc | jmettraux | :-)[ |
| 2012-08-02 06:44:53 utc | hartog | Another thought I had; would it not be nice to have a worker that states its abilities and store the required abilities with the workitem/msg? this way one could generate some scheduling or prioritizing |
| 2012-08-02 06:45:48 utc | jmettraux | I'm sorry, I don't understand the storing part |
| 2012-08-02 06:47:20 utc | hartog | to much haste again - when I launch a process, I specify the required capabilities |
| 2012-08-02 06:47:39 utc | hartog | (these could change along the way, i imagine) |
| 2012-08-02 06:48:29 utc | hartog | Something like : ```dash.launch, pdef, workitem, { :capabilities => [ :email, :amqp, :soap ] }``` |
| 2012-08-02 06:48:56 utc | jmettraux | ACTION listens |
| 2012-08-02 06:49:11 utc | hartog | meaning: workers that dont have all capabilities would ignore the messages |
| 2012-08-02 06:50:18 utc | hartog | to take Marco's case: One could have one worker with :capabilities => [ :high_prio ] and one worker with :capabilities => [ :low_prio ] |
| 2012-08-02 06:51:53 utc | hartog | to make it more interesting; a participant could also be asking for capabilites |
| 2012-08-02 06:52:19 utc | jmettraux | and me who thought that in such cases one would just add workers |
| 2012-08-02 06:52:47 utc | hartog | it may be a german thing ;) :D |
| 2012-08-02 06:54:29 utc | jmettraux | ok, I'll keep that in mind |
| 2012-08-02 06:55:16 utc | hartog | it was just a brain-fart, dont make to much of it! |
| 2012-08-02 06:56:49 utc | jmettraux | thanks for sharing anyway |
| 2012-08-02 08:05:10 utc | hallucynogenyc | Heya, are you here john? |
| 2012-08-02 08:11:34 utc | jmettraux | hallucynogenyc: hello, yes, welcome to #ruote |
| 2012-08-02 08:12:24 utc | hallucynogenyc | great :) I'm not sure you remember me, I opened a couple of tickets yesterday |
| 2012-08-02 08:12:28 utc | hallucynogenyc | on ruote-kit |
| 2012-08-02 08:13:10 utc | jmettraux | yes, I do remember, I'm not that senile ;-) |
| 2012-08-02 08:13:23 utc | jmettraux | thanks for your reports, it helps |
| 2012-08-02 08:13:27 utc | hallucynogenyc | well, my name can be tricky to remember haha |
| 2012-08-02 08:13:56 utc | hallucynogenyc | anyway, as you saw, I sarted yesterday |
| 2012-08-02 08:14:03 utc | hallucynogenyc | I want to implement a simple workflow |
| 2012-08-02 08:14:08 utc | hallucynogenyc | on a rails app |
| 2012-08-02 08:14:22 utc | hallucynogenyc | so well, now I got ruote-kit running in the rails template app |
| 2012-08-02 08:14:45 utc | hallucynogenyc | and there's something I keep struggling with |
| 2012-08-02 08:15:15 utc | hallucynogenyc | it seems to me that ruote-kit is just some kind of dashboard for ruote on a web app |
| 2012-08-02 08:15:42 utc | hallucynogenyc | I mean, apparently all I can do with it is view current processes or launch new ones etc |
| 2012-08-02 08:16:16 utc | hallucynogenyc | I'd expect this sampple rails app to be built like in 3 layers |
| 2012-08-02 08:16:31 utc | hallucynogenyc | ruote-kit -> ruote -> rails |
| 2012-08-02 08:16:45 utc | hallucynogenyc | but apparently, according to the documentation on the ruote-kit page |
| 2012-08-02 08:16:50 utc | jmettraux | well, ruote-kit is more like a admin tool |
| 2012-08-02 08:16:58 utc | hallucynogenyc | ye, exactly |
| 2012-08-02 08:17:00 utc | jmettraux | or a source of inspiration |
| 2012-08-02 08:17:09 utc | hallucynogenyc | so, why is it that in the documentation |
| 2012-08-02 08:17:28 utc | hallucynogenyc | it states: |
| 2012-08-02 08:17:31 utc | hallucynogenyc | "You can access Ruote’s engine anywhere in your Rails code by calling RuoteKit.engine" |
| 2012-08-02 08:17:55 utc | hallucynogenyc | how is it that ruote has been embeded inside it? what am I missing here? |
| 2012-08-02 08:18:42 utc | jmettraux | https://github.com/kennethkalmer/ruote-kit/blob/master/rails-template.rb#L26 |
| 2012-08-02 08:19:26 utc | jmettraux | a kind of shortcut |
| 2012-08-02 08:21:30 utc | hallucynogenyc | sorry if what I'm gonna say isn't very ruby friendly, but I just started with it too ;) |
| 2012-08-02 08:21:36 utc | hallucynogenyc | so, |
| 2012-08-02 08:21:50 utc | jmettraux | these days I tend to "place" the engine in Ruote.engine or Ruote.dashboard when there is no ruote-kit around |
| 2012-08-02 08:21:52 utc | hallucynogenyc | ruotekit is just initializing the ruote engine and holding a reference to it |
| 2012-08-02 08:22:04 utc | jmettraux | yes |
| 2012-08-02 08:22:18 utc | hallucynogenyc | I see |
| 2012-08-02 08:23:32 utc | hallucynogenyc | Thank you a lot of the help |
| 2012-08-02 08:24:03 utc | jmettraux | you're welcome |
| 2012-08-02 08:24:04 utc | hallucynogenyc | bye! |
| 2012-08-02 08:24:07 utc | hallucynogenyc | (I'm sure I'm coming back soon with more doubts ;) ) |
| 2012-08-02 08:24:08 utc | jmettraux | bye! |
| 2012-08-02 08:24:23 utc | jmettraux | feel free to use the mailing list as well if there are no answers here... |
| 2012-08-02 08:24:24 utc | jmettraux | too late |
| 2012-08-02 08:52:30 utc | hallucynogenyc | hi again |
| 2012-08-02 08:52:37 utc | hallucynogenyc | I'm back with more questions :D |
| 2012-08-02 08:53:26 utc | hallucynogenyc | If I chose to use XML process definitions |
| 2012-08-02 08:53:39 utc | hallucynogenyc | where am I supposed to store them? |
| 2012-08-02 08:53:43 utc | hallucynogenyc | (rails app) |
| 2012-08-02 09:01:05 utc | hartog | hallucynogenyc: it's up to you! You can store them in your database or on neat little spot on the filesystem |
| 2012-08-02 09:02:01 utc | hallucynogenyc | hmm so I'll just store them in assets/processes for now then :) |
| 2012-08-02 10:25:50 utc | hallucynogenyc | back again |
| 2012-08-02 10:26:05 utc | hallucynogenyc | what if the workflow involves a single person? |
| 2012-08-02 10:27:42 utc | hallucynogenyc | I have to do a process which involves different steps |
| 2012-08-02 10:27:48 utc | hallucynogenyc | but I do it all myself |
| 2012-08-02 10:28:52 utc | hallucynogenyc | looking at all the examples |
| 2012-08-02 10:29:09 utc | hallucynogenyc | it seems like ruotes only works when one person does one step |
| 2012-08-02 10:29:42 utc | hallucynogenyc | in fact it even seems like a process is composed by a defined order between participants |
| 2012-08-02 10:29:58 utc | hallucynogenyc | instead of what I would asume, a defined order between defined steps |
| 2012-08-02 10:30:46 utc | jmettraux | nothing prevents you from writing a flow that goes like: https://gist.github.com/3236108 |
| 2012-08-02 10:31:07 utc | jmettraux | participant != user |
| 2012-08-02 10:31:38 utc | jmettraux | you can dispatch to a participant backed by an "inbox" shared by multiple users |
| 2012-08-02 10:34:02 utc | hallucynogenyc | but what does this :task attribute really do? |
| 2012-08-02 10:34:36 utc | hallucynogenyc | I mean, will I have to code a consume method with an if-else for every possible task? |
| 2012-08-02 10:35:09 utc | jmettraux | no |
| 2012-08-02 10:35:19 utc | jmettraux | this task attribute is a convention |
| 2012-08-02 10:35:47 utc | jmettraux | in this snippet, I have context where a participant is mapped to a user |
| 2012-08-02 10:35:49 utc | jmettraux | "alice" |
| 2012-08-02 10:36:01 utc | jmettraux | and I deliver to consecutive tasks to that participant |
| 2012-08-02 10:36:09 utc | jmettraux | with different titles |
| 2012-08-02 10:36:28 utc | jmettraux | I was replying to your "what if the workflow involves a single person?" question |
| 2012-08-02 10:36:54 utc | jmettraux | "it seems like ruotes only works when one person does one step" is wrong |
| 2012-08-02 10:37:27 utc | jmettraux | hallucynogenyc: what's your background, where do you come from to Ruby? |
| 2012-08-02 10:42:43 utc | hallucynogenyc | Java mainly |
| 2012-08-02 10:42:54 utc | jmettraux | cool |
| 2012-08-02 10:43:20 utc | jmettraux | experience with jBPM or Activity or Bonita? |
| 2012-08-02 10:43:59 utc | hallucynogenyc | no, I just read about worflows, they seemt cool and decided to try with rails |
| 2012-08-02 10:44:13 utc | jmettraux | ouch |
| 2012-08-02 10:44:43 utc | hallucynogenyc | then I ended up on ruote because it seems like the only way to implement them natively |
| 2012-08-02 10:45:01 utc | jmettraux | ok |
| 2012-08-02 10:45:06 utc | hallucynogenyc | I tried activiti at the begining because it seemt like a more robust product |
| 2012-08-02 10:45:47 utc | jmettraux | lol |
| 2012-08-02 10:45:49 utc | hallucynogenyc | but the REST api documentation was close to non existant so I looked for something I could use from the inside |
| 2012-08-02 10:46:13 utc | hallucynogenyc | sorry if I offended you, just the first impression I had ;) |
| 2012-08-02 10:46:59 utc | jmettraux | yeah professional open source vs amateur open source |
| 2012-08-02 10:47:11 utc | jmettraux | those guys have a marketing team |
| 2012-08-02 10:47:58 utc | jmettraux | https://www.ohloh.net/p/ruote/ vs https://www.ohloh.net/p/activiti |
| 2012-08-02 10:49:15 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | hey |
| 2012-08-02 10:49:21 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | sorry my connection went down |
| 2012-08-02 10:49:39 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | last line I read were thecomparison links |
| 2012-08-02 10:50:20 utc | jmettraux | that's ok, it is the last line I sent |
| 2012-08-02 10:50:26 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | I was saying it doesn't matter how professional activiti is, it's still a nightmare to integrate it with Rails or so it seemt to me |
| 2012-08-02 10:50:55 utc | jmettraux | ok, maybe ruote is a nightmare too |
| 2012-08-02 10:51:36 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | well, activiti required communication with an almost undocumented http API |
| 2012-08-02 10:51:53 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | and ruote is already runing on a test rails app here :) |
| 2012-08-02 10:52:03 utc | jmettraux | :-) |
| 2012-08-02 10:52:22 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | so where were we... |
| 2012-08-02 10:52:48 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | ah yes, say I want to implement the process which is handled by a single user |
| 2012-08-02 10:53:00 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | you were saying I should use the task attribute |
| 2012-08-02 10:53:08 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | and a single participant |
| 2012-08-02 10:53:31 utc | jmettraux | ruote-kit, uses a single participant (a catchall) backed by a StorageParticipant |
| 2012-08-02 10:53:42 utc | jmettraux | it's simply an inbox |
| 2012-08-02 10:53:56 utc | jmettraux | so the :task attribute becomes like the subject of an email... |
| 2012-08-02 10:54:08 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | oh so I have the solution already working and I didn't know it |
| 2012-08-02 10:54:13 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | amazing |
| 2012-08-02 10:54:16 utc | jmettraux | that's how ruote-kit is configured by default |
| 2012-08-02 10:55:48 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | is there anywhere I could find all this information? |
| 2012-08-02 10:56:14 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | I've been looking at literally everything I could find on the ruote-kit website |
| 2012-08-02 10:56:19 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | readme* |
| 2012-08-02 10:56:26 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | and everything at the web |
| 2012-08-02 10:56:30 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | the ruote web |
| 2012-08-02 10:56:51 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | and I never found anything about this |
| 2012-08-02 10:58:36 utc | jmettraux | yes, it's true that the "registration of participants" section of the readme only mentions the catchall as a "eat all the cookies" thing |
| 2012-08-02 10:59:00 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | Well, and to be honest when I read that |
| 2012-08-02 10:59:00 utc | jmettraux | please open an issue for that: https://github.com/kennethkalmer/ruote-kit/issues?direction=desc&sort=created&state=open |
| 2012-08-02 10:59:08 utc | jmettraux | I'll take the time to fix that |
| 2012-08-02 10:59:21 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | I thought it was talking about browser cookies |
| 2012-08-02 10:59:30 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | and I wasn't understanding what it was talking about |
| 2012-08-02 10:59:35 utc | jmettraux | understood |
| 2012-08-02 10:59:56 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | what should I write on the issue? |
| 2012-08-02 11:00:56 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | "Please explain how the inbox works?" |
| 2012-08-02 11:01:05 utc | jmettraux | just what you described now: "readme is missing info about default (catchall) participant" (and it's confusing with "cookies") |
| 2012-08-02 11:01:24 utc | jmettraux | that would be good in the body too |
| 2012-08-02 11:02:02 utc | jmettraux | http://ruote.rubyforge.org/participants.html <- I'll have to mention the catchall in there too |
| 2012-08-02 11:03:27 utc | jmettraux | thanks in advance! |
| 2012-08-02 11:04:48 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | out of curiosity, is any serious organization that you know of using ruote? not meaning to offend, but at least to me, its taking a huge effort to understand how it works with the available information on the github repos and the website |
| 2012-08-02 11:05:10 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | I'd love to see some live examples |
| 2012-08-02 11:05:48 utc | jmettraux | please don't forget that the documentation is meant for average ruby developers, not freshly minted ones |
| 2012-08-02 11:06:26 utc | jmettraux | so most of the huge effort is not our fault |
| 2012-08-02 11:06:56 utc | jmettraux | here you go: http://ruote.rubyforge.org/users.html |
| 2012-08-02 11:07:25 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | well, all this catchall thing, which seems like the base on how to implement a web service using ruote |
| 2012-08-02 11:07:31 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | with it's inbox etc |
| 2012-08-02 11:08:19 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | was being omitted over all the documentation wasn't it? |
| 2012-08-02 11:08:30 utc | jmettraux | and don't forget that your new to workflows |
| 2012-08-02 11:08:35 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | I mean, I wonder how anyone made it work without any source of information |
| 2012-08-02 11:08:58 utc | jmettraux | maybe they read the source |
| 2012-08-02 11:09:14 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | maybe this catchall is a very common thing across workflow engines and they already knew? |
| 2012-08-02 11:09:30 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | really, I have no idea |
| 2012-08-02 11:09:32 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | :) |
| 2012-08-02 11:10:09 utc | jmettraux | the generated configuration file has a least some indicators: https://github.com/kennethkalmer/ruote-kit/blob/master/rails-template.rb#L46-56 |
| 2012-08-02 11:10:27 utc | jmettraux | you're the first one to complain |
| 2012-08-02 11:10:41 utc | jmettraux | we will fix that |
| 2012-08-02 11:10:50 utc | jmettraux | thanks for complaining and being frank |
| 2012-08-02 11:10:59 utc | jmettraux | don't be afraid to offend |
| 2012-08-02 11:11:16 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | well, having this premmium chat support service I can't really "complain" at all ;) |
| 2012-08-02 11:12:07 utc | jmettraux | :-) |
| 2012-08-02 11:12:57 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | is there any default view included with ruote-kit to manage the inbox? |
| 2012-08-02 11:13:09 utc | jmettraux | yes |
| 2012-08-02 11:13:28 utc | jmettraux | /workitems |
| 2012-08-02 11:13:31 utc | jmettraux | iirc |
| 2012-08-02 11:13:59 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | oh |
| 2012-08-02 11:14:06 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | it's this thing that comes in the dashboard |
| 2012-08-02 11:14:27 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | I thought it was just a "backoffice" lol |
| 2012-08-02 11:15:30 utc | jmettraux | ah, one thing, you're also free to fork the project, fix its doc and then submit pull requests |
| 2012-08-02 11:17:24 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | I'll sure do once I make all of this work |
| 2012-08-02 11:18:04 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | I'm afraid there's nothing good I can write on it right now :) |
| 2012-08-02 11:19:03 utc | jmettraux | typo fixes and repairing confusing sentences are great too |
| 2012-08-02 11:19:33 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | well, if you let me I'd love to just completely rewritting the catchall thing |
| 2012-08-02 11:19:40 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | once I really understand it |
| 2012-08-02 11:19:47 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | rewrite* |
| 2012-08-02 11:20:05 utc | jmettraux | just send a pull request, I'll pull in it if it makes sense |
| 2012-08-02 11:20:21 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | and then include an example using the catchall which I can't seem t find anywhere either |
| 2012-08-02 11:20:48 utc | jmettraux | config/initializers/ruote_kit.rb iirc |
| 2012-08-02 11:20:55 utc | hallucynogenyc_ | I just create a normal process definition where the participant is always :catchall and the task is different each time yes? |
| 2012-08-02 11:21:44 utc | jmettraux | use "alice" or "bob" or "ceo" or "clerks" or "accounting" or "us_salesteam", not "catchall" |
| 2012-08-02 11:22:25 utc | jmettraux | ACTION will be back in half an hour |
| 2012-08-02 11:54:36 utc | jmettraux | back |
| 2012-08-02 12:50:20 utc | jmettraux | going to bed now, if you ask questions here maybe kennethkalmer and/or hartog will answer (although they're probably busy on their own stuff) |
| 2012-08-02 12:50:35 utc | kennethkalmer | will do best to help |
| 2012-08-02 12:50:39 utc | jmettraux | if there's no answer, then there is the mailing list: http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users |
| 2012-08-02 12:50:42 utc | kennethkalmer | have a good night jmettraux! |
| 2012-08-02 12:50:49 utc | jmettraux | kennethkalmer: thanks, have a good evening! |