| 2012-01-19 02:03:39 utc | wayneeseguin | jmettraux: Is ruote 1.9.3 compatible ? |
| 2012-01-19 02:04:04 utc | jmettraux | wayneeseguin: hello, it should yes |
| 2012-01-19 02:04:11 utc | wayneeseguin | ok good :) |
| 2012-01-19 02:04:24 utc | wayneeseguin | I'm looking to use it in a project soon |
| 2012-01-19 02:04:50 utc | jmettraux | if it's not then I'll make sure it does, CI goes 1.9.2-p290 and 1.8.7-p249 |
| 2012-01-19 02:05:05 utc | wayneeseguin | ok |
| 2012-01-19 02:05:23 utc | wayneeseguin | Is there a limit that you've seen to the # of workflows running at any given time ? |
| 2012-01-19 02:05:29 utc | wayneeseguin | based on anything? |
| 2012-01-19 02:05:56 utc | jmettraux | depends on the storage |
| 2012-01-19 02:06:06 utc | wayneeseguin | unexpected response :) |
| 2012-01-19 02:06:23 utc | wayneeseguin | Storage is in a PostgreSQL database, at least that's the intent |
| 2012-01-19 02:06:38 utc | wayneeseguin | We are going to have lots of data rows streaming in |
| 2012-01-19 02:06:55 utc | wayneeseguin | each row will need to be looked at and potentially a workflow (or more) run on it |
| 2012-01-19 02:08:14 utc | jmettraux | (sorry for the latency, actually pairing) |
| 2012-01-19 02:08:47 utc | wayneeseguin | woo, yeah we can have this convo another time :) |
| 2012-01-19 02:08:49 utc | wayneeseguin | thanks |
| 2012-01-19 02:08:52 utc | wayneeseguin | PM me when you have time |
| 2012-01-19 02:09:16 utc | jmettraux | it's ok |
| 2012-01-19 02:09:38 utc | jmettraux | theoretically, has long as you have storage space you can have workflows |
| 2012-01-19 02:13:46 utc | jmettraux | s/has/as/ |
| 2012-01-19 02:14:06 utc | jmettraux | wayneeseguin: over, I have like 15 minutes for you now :-) |
| 2012-01-19 02:17:41 utc | wayneeseguin | :D |