| 2010-12-16 00:52:52 utc | InformatiQ | ./ruote.rb:7: uninitialized constant Ruote::Engine (NameError) |
| 2010-12-16 00:53:47 utc | jmettraux | please don't name your file ruote.rb |
| 2010-12-16 00:54:03 utc | jmettraux | that conflicts with "require 'ruote'" |
| 2010-12-16 00:54:27 utc | jmettraux | cat catching its own tail |
| 2010-12-16 00:54:54 utc | InformatiQ | silly me |
| 2010-12-16 00:55:23 utc | jmettraux | don't worry, I fell for it once, and it took me quite a while to understand |
| 2010-12-16 00:55:25 utc | InformatiQ | great it works fine now |
| 2010-12-16 00:55:30 utc | jmettraux | :-) |
| 2010-12-16 00:58:50 utc | InformatiQ | ps works and shows 3 processes running |
| 2010-12-16 00:59:16 utc | InformatiQ | that is after i nuked my workdir and started the process 3 times |
| 2010-12-16 00:59:25 utc | InformatiQ | that means my process never ends |
| 2010-12-16 00:59:32 utc | InformatiQ | hmmm |
| 2010-12-16 01:00:25 utc | jmettraux | maybe it's stuck waiting for a participant answer |
| 2010-12-16 01:02:37 utc | jmettraux | let me cook something |
| 2010-12-16 01:02:58 utc | InformatiQ | https://gist.github.com/742869 |
| 2010-12-16 01:03:11 utc | InformatiQ | this is part of my process that i beleive it gets stuck |
| 2010-12-16 01:03:29 utc | InformatiQ | i doubtthe loop jump :if part is the guilty |
| 2010-12-16 01:04:12 utc | InformatiQ | i have seen ruote-kit once and it seemed very sensible just would haveloved to have it in a more terminal friendly form |
| 2010-12-16 01:04:28 utc | InformatiQ | ACTION those crazy sys admins |
| 2010-12-16 01:04:40 utc | jmettraux | makes 100% sense |
| 2010-12-16 01:04:56 utc | jmettraux | you process def is quite hardcore |
| 2010-12-16 01:05:22 utc | InformatiQ | i hope that is a good thing |
| 2010-12-16 01:05:53 utc | jmettraux | well, "listen" is an advanced expression, it should be OK |
| 2010-12-16 01:06:35 utc | InformatiQ | the listen seems to work fine it keeps iterating or at least i think so |
| 2010-12-16 01:06:50 utc | InformatiQ | not sure though that the jump stops at some point |
| 2010-12-16 01:07:15 utc | InformatiQ | and the echos are not printed |
| 2010-12-16 01:07:57 utc | InformatiQ | ouch |
| 2010-12-16 01:08:13 utc | jmettraux | they should print where the worker is |
| 2010-12-16 01:09:53 utc | jmettraux | if you guys need a console tool, I will cook one, but give me some time, I have other things on the burner |
| 2010-12-16 01:11:42 utc | InformatiQ | jmettraux: sure take as much time as you need |
| 2010-12-16 01:12:30 utc | InformatiQ | we can also helpon things if needed (resources can be arranged for some time) |
| 2010-12-16 01:13:21 utc | jmettraux | well, your resources are all pythonists :-( |
| 2010-12-16 01:15:23 utc | InformatiQ | well that's true for now |
| 2010-12-16 01:15:47 utc | jmettraux | if you use that one : https://gist.github.com/742883 it will display the status of each process |
| 2010-12-16 01:16:19 utc | jmettraux | it lists the expressions that are currently active, usually the one with the longer id/expid is the current one |
| 2010-12-16 01:16:25 utc | jmettraux | so you can infer where it's at |
| 2010-12-16 01:17:02 utc | jmettraux | too bad you guys are using 2.1.11, the current edge version has a nicer output |
| 2010-12-16 01:17:34 utc | jmettraux | brain_in_vat: sunny cafe, I'm jealous ! |
| 2010-12-16 01:20:39 utc | InformatiQ | not sure what you mean by sunny cafe but i am starting to feel jealous that someone still sees sun |
| 2010-12-16 01:43:37 utc | InformatiQ | now the process works as expected |