| 2010-10-07 08:42:33 utc | kennethkalmer | coffee ? |
| 2010-10-07 08:42:38 utc | kennethkalmer | and greetings ! |
| 2010-10-07 08:43:01 utc | jmettraux | kennethkalmer: yes, please ! |
| 2010-10-07 08:43:02 utc | jmettraux | thanks |
| 2010-10-07 08:43:40 utc | kennethkalmer | ACTION emits awesome espresso doppio |
| 2010-10-07 08:43:54 utc | jmettraux | ACTION receives and consumes |
| 2010-10-07 08:43:59 utc | jmettraux | :-) |
| 2010-10-07 08:44:11 utc | kennethkalmer | thanks you both for the awesomeness that is ruote-kit ! |
| 2010-10-07 08:44:16 utc | jmettraux | I still have to release ruote-amqp and ruote-beanstalk |
| 2010-10-07 08:44:22 utc | jmettraux | does it work well ? |
| 2010-10-07 08:44:28 utc | kennethkalmer | updated yesterday to 2.1.11 and almost fell on my back :) |
| 2010-10-07 08:44:31 utc | kennethkalmer | it is great |
| 2010-10-07 08:44:49 utc | jmettraux | :-) wonderful news |
| 2010-10-07 08:44:58 utc | kennethkalmer | just curious, having one issue with a participant using em-http |
| 2010-10-07 08:45:07 utc | jmettraux | oh |
| 2010-10-07 08:45:13 utc | kennethkalmer | seems em-http never makes the request |
| 2010-10-07 08:45:28 utc | kennethkalmer | have you seen anything like it ? |
| 2010-10-07 08:45:30 utc | jmettraux | lazy laddie |
| 2010-10-07 08:45:47 utc | jmettraux | no, never seen anything like that |
| 2010-10-07 08:45:55 utc | jmettraux | conflicting EMs ? |
| 2010-10-07 08:46:09 utc | kennethkalmer | no, let me bounce it off you |
| 2010-10-07 08:46:23 utc | kennethkalmer | first round I was using rk inside thin, and running a worker |
| 2010-10-07 08:46:29 utc | kennethkalmer | em-http worked fine |
| 2010-10-07 08:46:48 utc | kennethkalmer | now converted to using rk in passenger, and having a worker in a rake task |
| 2010-10-07 08:47:02 utc | kennethkalmer | now em-http inside participants are not doing anything... |
| 2010-10-07 08:47:06 utc | kennethkalmer | very peculiar |
| 2010-10-07 08:47:30 utc | jmettraux | is the worker alive ? |
| 2010-10-07 08:47:48 utc | kennethkalmer | oh yeah, debug shows the workitem is consumed by the participant too |
| 2010-10-07 08:47:55 utc | jmettraux | ok |
| 2010-10-07 08:48:11 utc | kennethkalmer | however, callback/errback never gets called and I can see the request is never made |
| 2010-10-07 08:48:25 utc | jmettraux | is it a participant class or a block participant ? |
| 2010-10-07 08:48:25 utc | kennethkalmer | even the timeout setting for em-http is not respected |
| 2010-10-07 08:48:27 utc | kennethkalmer | class |
| 2010-10-07 08:48:33 utc | jmettraux | weird |
| 2010-10-07 08:48:38 utc | kennethkalmer | ACTION doesn't like block participants :) |
| 2010-10-07 08:48:44 utc | jmettraux | :) |
| 2010-10-07 08:49:03 utc | jmettraux | does an error pop up ? |
| 2010-10-07 08:49:10 utc | jmettraux | a ruote process error ? |
| 2010-10-07 08:49:13 utc | kennethkalmer | dead quiet |
| 2010-10-07 08:49:26 utc | kennethkalmer | on ctrl+c to the worker the errback is called |
| 2010-10-07 08:49:31 utc | kennethkalmer | so something deep inside EM |
| 2010-10-07 08:49:38 utc | kennethkalmer | tried do_not_thread, same thing |
| 2010-10-07 08:49:57 utc | jmettraux | would adding a rescue with so p add some verbosity to pinpoint the issue |
| 2010-10-07 08:50:00 utc | jmettraux | ? |
| 2010-10-07 08:50:22 utc | kennethkalmer | don't know, let me make a plain test app to show symptoms |
| 2010-10-07 09:05:53 utc | jmettraux | kennethkalmer: em-http-request ? |
| 2010-10-07 09:06:08 utc | kennethkalmer | yep, got sample done just pushing to github |
| 2010-10-07 09:07:51 utc | kennethkalmer | http://github.com/kennethkalmer/rk-em-blues |
| 2010-10-07 09:07:59 utc | kennethkalmer | so, rackup in one console |
| 2010-10-07 09:08:02 utc | kennethkalmer | rake worker in another |
| 2010-10-07 09:08:15 utc | jmettraux | ok |
| 2010-10-07 09:08:29 utc | kennethkalmer | i'm running low on battery, will have to relocate to the office in 15 minutes or so |
| 2010-10-07 09:08:52 utc | jmettraux | ok, I'll go home and jog in around 45 minutes |
| 2010-10-07 09:09:05 utc | kennethkalmer | :) |
| 2010-10-07 09:09:06 utc | jmettraux | in about |
| 2010-10-07 09:09:47 utc | jmettraux | bundler is great in those ad-hoc cases |
| 2010-10-07 09:09:58 utc | jmettraux | (it's always great) |
| 2010-10-07 09:10:17 utc | jmettraux | which ruby should I use ? |
| 2010-10-07 09:11:39 utc | jmettraux | kennethkalmer: which ruby should I use ? |
| 2010-10-07 09:11:47 utc | kennethkalmer | 1.9.2 |
| 2010-10-07 09:12:04 utc | kennethkalmer | even now under thin it isn't spawing, hmmm |
| 2010-10-07 09:12:37 utc | jmettraux | weird |
| 2010-10-07 09:14:05 utc | kennethkalmer | nevermind, had a typo :/ |
| 2010-10-07 09:14:10 utc | kennethkalmer | testing for new push |
| 2010-10-07 09:15:06 utc | kennethkalmer | great, just pushed new update |
| 2010-10-07 09:15:17 utc | kennethkalmer | ok, so 'thin start' will show the participant working as expected |
| 2010-10-07 09:15:28 utc | kennethkalmer | 'rackup' + 'rake worker' shows the issues |
| 2010-10-07 09:17:19 utc | jmettraux | should I launch a workflow ? |
| 2010-10-07 09:17:39 utc | jmettraux | aaah |
| 2010-10-07 09:17:39 utc | kennethkalmer | yeah, from / it has one option |
| 2010-10-07 09:17:41 utc | kennethkalmer | :) |
| 2010-10-07 09:17:42 utc | jmettraux | "show blues" |
| 2010-10-07 09:18:02 utc | jmettraux | ping requested on the worker |
| 2010-10-07 09:18:13 utc | jmettraux | trying thin start and rackup -s thin |
| 2010-10-07 09:18:52 utc | jmettraux | ping requested on the worker |
| 2010-10-07 09:19:00 utc | jmettraux | was rackup -s thin |
| 2010-10-07 09:19:06 utc | jmettraux | trying with thin start |
| 2010-10-07 09:19:44 utc | kennethkalmer | i'll test with REE quickly |
| 2010-10-07 09:20:05 utc | jmettraux | I'm sorry, but I have the same output on the worker each time (3 cases) |
| 2010-10-07 09:20:44 utc | kennethkalmer | wow, that is strange, so the http callback is never completed by you ? |
| 2010-10-07 09:20:50 utc | jmettraux | so I guess I have 3 |
| 2010-10-07 09:20:54 utc | jmettraux | failures |
| 2010-10-07 09:21:07 utc | jmettraux | that's better than 3 successes though |
| 2010-10-07 09:22:31 utc | kennethkalmer | if you stop the worker, and just run thin ? same issue ? |
| 2010-10-07 09:22:49 utc | jmettraux | let me check |
| 2010-10-07 09:23:07 utc | jmettraux | ping ok |
| 2010-10-07 09:23:09 utc | kennethkalmer | thank you |
| 2010-10-07 09:23:11 utc | jmettraux | great |
| 2010-10-07 09:23:27 utc | kennethkalmer | wonder why the reactor is freaking out like this... |
| 2010-10-07 09:23:38 utc | kennethkalmer | i'll test with em-dns as well |
| 2010-10-07 09:23:46 utc | kennethkalmer | see if it is em itself, or em-http |
| 2010-10-07 09:24:10 utc | kennethkalmer | cause the project I'm using this in uses plenty of em participants |
| 2010-10-07 09:24:57 utc | jmettraux | could it be rk's run_worker ? |
| 2010-10-07 09:25:23 utc | jmettraux | am I right when I say, the participant only works when the worker is inside of the engine ? |
| 2010-10-07 09:25:44 utc | kennethkalmer | yes |
| 2010-10-07 09:25:54 utc | kennethkalmer | however the participant always gets called |
| 2010-10-07 09:26:02 utc | jmettraux | aah |
| 2010-10-07 09:26:05 utc | kennethkalmer | so #consume is triggered |
| 2010-10-07 09:26:20 utc | kennethkalmer | seems the reactor is not running correctly |
| 2010-10-07 09:27:20 utc | jmettraux | what about trying to run some em-http request when staring the worker's EM in the Rakefile ? |
| 2010-10-07 09:27:51 utc | kennethkalmer | works fine |
| 2010-10-07 09:28:07 utc | jmettraux | ok |
| 2010-10-07 09:29:04 utc | kennethkalmer | just push sample task 'em_test' |
| 2010-10-07 09:29:25 utc | kennethkalmer | so on REE it shows the same symptons |
| 2010-10-07 09:29:32 utc | kennethkalmer | thanks for checking my sanity |
| 2010-10-07 09:29:39 utc | kennethkalmer | i'll debug at the office and let you know |
| 2010-10-07 09:29:45 utc | jmettraux | ok |
| 2010-10-07 09:29:45 utc | kennethkalmer | enjoy the jog ! |
| 2010-10-07 09:29:48 utc | jmettraux | glad to help |
| 2010-10-07 09:29:50 utc | jmettraux | thanks ! |
| 2010-10-07 09:29:55 utc | kennethkalmer | regards to Yuki |
| 2010-10-07 09:30:01 utc | kennethkalmer | ttyl ! |
| 2010-10-07 09:30:15 utc | jmettraux | :-) |
| 2010-10-07 11:51:29 utc | jmettraux | kennethkalmer: how is it going ? |
| 2010-10-07 11:51:50 utc | kennethkalmer | ok thanks, haven't had a chance to dig in again as I got sidetracked when I entered the office :/ |
| 2010-10-07 11:53:03 utc | kennethkalmer | had a good jog ? |
| 2010-10-07 11:57:41 utc | jmettraux | yes, excellent, autumn is here, temperature is optimal |
| 2010-10-07 11:59:58 utc | kennethkalmer | beautiful |
| 2010-10-07 12:00:06 utc | kennethkalmer | we're dying of heat, rain is reluctant to come |
| 2010-10-07 12:00:20 utc | jmettraux | ouch |
| 2010-10-07 14:13:42 utc | jmettraux | kennethkalmer: how's the rain ? |
| 2010-10-07 14:13:48 utc | kennethkalmer | beautiful |
| 2010-10-07 14:14:27 utc | jmettraux | will you still be around in 30 minutes ? I need a critical eye on a piece of code |
| 2010-10-07 14:20:22 utc | kennethkalmer | unfortunately not, i have to leave in 5 minutes |
| 2010-10-07 14:20:37 utc | kennethkalmer | rain wil block up the roads, I can if you mail me look at it tonight |
| 2010-10-07 14:20:40 utc | kennethkalmer | if that is ok ? |
| 2010-10-07 14:21:18 utc | jmettraux | OK |
| 2010-10-07 14:21:22 utc | jmettraux | thanks :-) |
| 2010-10-07 14:21:48 utc | kennethkalmer | pleasure :) |