| 2010-08-25 14:37:56 utc | jmettraux | gmcinnes: hello, what's frustrating ? |
| 2010-08-25 14:42:11 utc | gmcinnes | jmettraux: oh. hey. good to see you. |
| 2010-08-25 14:42:23 utc | jmettraux | I can't see you ;-) |
| 2010-08-25 14:42:44 utc | gmcinnes | Good job. I'd have to put on trousers :) |
| 2010-08-25 14:42:51 utc | jmettraux | lol |
| 2010-08-25 14:43:05 utc | gmcinnes | I was working on upgrading to 2.1 from the 1.9 series. Driving me a bit nuts. |
| 2010-08-25 14:43:33 utc | jmettraux | aaah |
| 2010-08-25 14:43:56 utc | gmcinnes | I think I have most of the kinks fixed. |
| 2010-08-25 14:44:03 utc | jmettraux | fixr is in the same situation as you |
| 2010-08-25 14:44:25 utc | fixr | indeed, I was about to comment on that ;) |
| 2010-08-25 14:44:27 utc | jmettraux | great |
| 2010-08-25 14:44:37 utc | jmettraux | great on most of the kinks fixed |
| 2010-08-25 14:44:42 utc | jmettraux | fixr: hello ! |
| 2010-08-25 14:45:02 utc | gmcinnes | But two concerns remain: a) there seems to be a bug in the Decision Participant.... It's complaining I'm not passing the :table option |
| 2010-08-25 14:45:04 utc | fixr | I'm still learning, but have come a long way already. If I can help, I will! |
| 2010-08-25 14:45:18 utc | fixr | jmettraux: hi! |
| 2010-08-25 14:45:20 utc | gmcinnes | And b) The performance seems to be a good bit worse. Is that expected? |
| 2010-08-25 14:45:27 utc | fixr | jmettraux: btw, quick question before you leave :). Have you had the chance to test ruote-dm on edge? |
| 2010-08-25 14:45:49 utc | jmettraux | a) maybe you could post on the mailing list the details and symptoms of the issue |
| 2010-08-25 14:46:00 utc | jmettraux | b) what storage are you using ? |
| 2010-08-25 14:46:14 utc | jmettraux | fixr: ruote-dm seems mostly to work on edge |
| 2010-08-25 14:46:48 utc | jmettraux | but I'm working on ruote-redis right now, if you encounter issues, please post them on the mailing and I can test ruote-dm about it tomorrow |
| 2010-08-25 14:47:50 utc | fixr | will do. That's part of why I'm asking, maybe I can test it a little bit |
| 2010-08-25 14:48:07 utc | jmettraux | that'd be great |
| 2010-08-25 14:48:18 utc | jmettraux | so that I/we can release sooner |
| 2010-08-25 14:48:38 utc | fixr | gmcinnes: what storage are you using? |
| 2010-08-25 14:48:59 utc | gmcinnes | Was getting around to posting. Other projects keep interfering :) FsStorage is the goal, but I was having problems with that so switched to HashParticipant |
| 2010-08-25 14:49:04 utc | gmcinnes | HashStorage sorry. |
| 2010-08-25 14:49:09 utc | jmettraux | whoah |
| 2010-08-25 14:49:16 utc | jmettraux | FsStorage is fast |
| 2010-08-25 14:49:38 utc | jmettraux | are you using a disk over a network ? |
| 2010-08-25 14:51:33 utc | gmcinnes | jmettraux: local disk. My FsStorage problems weren't strictly speed related. It seemed to be falling over completely. When I used $DEBUG large amounts of exceptions were reported. I gave up on that and switched to HashParticipant. |
| 2010-08-25 14:51:44 utc | gmcinnes | jmettraux: Doh. HashStorage. |
| 2010-08-25 14:51:58 utc | jmettraux | what operating system are you using, and which ruby ? |
| 2010-08-25 14:52:14 utc | gmcinnes | I assume HashStorage should be faster than FsStorage? |
| 2010-08-25 14:52:24 utc | jmettraux | yes, but it doesn't persist to disk |
| 2010-08-25 14:52:56 utc | gmcinnes | OS X and rvm'ed Ruby Enterprise Edition 1.8.7 |
| 2010-08-25 14:53:13 utc | gmcinnes | jmettraux: I can live without the persistance for testing purposes. |
| 2010-08-25 14:53:28 utc | jmettraux | I'd love to see one of those exception stack traces |
| 2010-08-25 14:53:42 utc | gmcinnes | jmettraux: What I'm surprised about is that 2.1 HashStorage seems to be faster than 1.9 FsStorage equivalent. |
| 2010-08-25 14:53:49 utc | jmettraux | if you never report the issue, it will not get fixed |
| 2010-08-25 14:53:58 utc | jmettraux | well |
| 2010-08-25 14:54:15 utc | jmettraux | isn't that normal ? |
| 2010-08-25 14:54:27 utc | jmettraux | memory storage is faster than disk storage usually... |
| 2010-08-25 14:54:29 utc | jmettraux | ;-) |
| 2010-08-25 14:54:47 utc | gmcinnes | jmettraux: oh. my fat fingers this morning :( |
| 2010-08-25 14:55:14 utc | gmcinnes | jmettraux: 2.1 HashStorage seems to be *slower* than 1.9 FsStorage equivalent, I meant to say. |
| 2010-08-25 14:55:28 utc | jmettraux | strange |
| 2010-08-25 14:56:04 utc | jmettraux | 2.1 is simpler, it has no caching |
| 2010-08-25 14:56:43 utc | jmettraux | we should build a bench to do that comparison |
| 2010-08-25 14:57:31 utc | gmcinnes | jmettraux: Will report. Wanted to check in with you first to make sure I"m not doing anything stupid first :). As usual, I'm juggling 4 projects and I switched context out of ruote. |
| 2010-08-25 14:57:45 utc | jmettraux | ouch, I understand the pain |
| 2010-08-25 15:12:56 utc | jmettraux | gentlemen, I have to leave you |
| 2010-08-25 15:13:02 utc | jmettraux | please do your best |
| 2010-08-25 15:13:14 utc | gmcinnes | bon soir. I'll follow up on the mailing list, good sir. |
| 2010-08-25 15:13:18 utc | jmettraux | don't hesitate to post to the mailing list |
| 2010-08-25 15:13:24 utc | jmettraux | bonne nuit ! |
| 2010-08-25 15:13:31 utc | fixr | bye! |