ruote log_2010-05-14

2010-05-14 02:21:42 utc hansen_ hello John
2010-05-14 02:23:32 utc jmettraux hello !
2010-05-14 02:24:31 utc hansen_ I think I need your help.
2010-05-14 02:24:38 utc jmettraux ok
2010-05-14 02:30:48 utc hansen_ how can I implementations a approve chain,is there some suggestion? thank you
2010-05-14 02:32:20 utc jmettraux standard pattern : http://gist.github.com/400742
2010-05-14 02:33:01 utc jmettraux where "work", "review" and "done" are participants
2010-05-14 02:33:17 utc jmettraux the field "approved" is meant to be set by the "review" participant
2010-05-14 02:33:42 utc hansen_ But I have a lot of people
2010-05-14 02:33:48 utc jmettraux ?
2010-05-14 02:35:16 utc hansen_ how to build the relation between people and participant?
2010-05-14 02:35:32 utc jmettraux use a storage participant
2010-05-14 02:35:59 utc jmettraux then in your rails application use some logic to decide which user has the right to view which workitem
2010-05-14 02:36:35 utc jmettraux RuoteKit.storage_participant.select { |wi| wi.participant_name == 'review' }
2010-05-14 02:36:37 utc jmettraux for example
2010-05-14 02:36:50 utc jmettraux or simply, if you want to use directly user names
2010-05-14 02:37:16 utc jmettraux RuoteKit.storage_participant.select { |wi| wi.participant_name == current_user_name }
2010-05-14 02:37:45 utc jmettraux easier :
2010-05-14 02:38:01 utc jmettraux RuoteKit.storage_participant.by_participant('review')
2010-05-14 02:38:13 utc jmettraux will return all the workitems where participant name is "review"
2010-05-14 02:38:39 utc jmettraux these are just examples
2010-05-14 02:41:07 utc jmettraux another technique is to have participant names mapped to groups of people
2010-05-14 02:41:15 utc jmettraux and then have a workitem field named 'user'
2010-05-14 02:41:38 utc jmettraux when this field is empty it means that the workitem is not assigned to a user...
2010-05-14 02:41:53 utc jmettraux there are many techniques, your imagination is the limit
2010-05-14 02:45:34 utc hansen_ OK ,I think I understand now
2010-05-14 02:45:44 utc jmettraux great !
2010-05-14 02:46:37 utc hansen_ I user one participant mapped to a goup of people
2010-05-14 02:46:53 utc hansen_ use
2010-05-14 02:46:58 utc jmettraux ok
2010-05-14 02:48:38 utc jmettraux is Eric Woo a friend of you ?
2010-05-14 02:49:05 utc hansen_ Each people have a varible "degree to" control it's Right
2010-05-14 02:49:12 utc hansen_ no
2010-05-14 03:11:34 utc hansen_ oh i'm sorry Eric Woo is my friend,i just now!
2010-05-14 03:11:39 utc jmettraux :)
2010-05-14 03:14:38 utc hansen_ Our team have five people
2010-05-14 03:15:23 utc jmettraux are you going to Ruby Conf China 2010 ?
2010-05-14 03:15:48 utc jmettraux hello ericwoo
2010-05-14 03:16:12 utc ericwoo hi,john
2010-05-14 03:16:59 utc hansen_ Sorry,I don't know that? where and when? thank yo
2010-05-14 03:19:20 utc jmettraux hansen_: http://twitter.com/Kozmasumitsu/status/12654076351
2010-05-14 03:21:49 utc hansen_ Oh,twitter is Forbid in china
2010-05-14 03:21:55 utc jmettraux :(
2010-05-14 03:22:11 utc jmettraux it says "RubyConf China 2010, June 26 at Shanghai TV University, International conf room."
2010-05-14 03:22:28 utc jmettraux but the website http://rubyconfchina.org/ is empty :(
2010-05-14 03:23:10 utc hansen_ I found that too
2010-05-14 03:38:07 utc ericwoo i still want to know if the table of decision_participant can get the data from database.
2010-05-14 04:16:12 utc jmettraux ericwoo: it sould be easy to implement
2010-05-14 04:16:27 utc jmettraux but for now, the decision participant only reads from CSV files
2010-05-14 04:16:54 utc jmettraux somehow, I don't think you need DecisionParticipant for that "formally"
2010-05-14 04:17:05 utc jmettraux a participant is like a function
2010-05-14 04:17:34 utc jmettraux it takes as input a workitem and some "other elements" and gives back a [modified] workitem
2010-05-14 04:18:02 utc jmettraux some "other elements" could be "fetching some configuration from a database"
2010-05-14 04:20:40 utc jmettraux for example : http://gist.github.com/400811
2010-05-14 04:21:26 utc jmettraux in this WooDecisionParticipant, some hypothetical SalesResult [activerecord] model is consulted to determine the sales result for this year
2010-05-14 04:21:55 utc jmettraux if the amount is superior to 10000, then the participant "decides" to set the field "approved" to true
2010-05-14 04:22:22 utc jmettraux it then replies to the engine (lets the process continue)
2010-05-14 05:41:17 utc ericwoo hi,john,thank you very much.
2010-05-14 05:41:25 utc jmettraux you're welcome