| 2010-05-09 04:06:18 utc | threetee | hi jmettraux |
| 2010-05-09 04:06:32 utc | jmettraux | Hello ! |
| 2010-05-09 04:06:39 utc | threetee | question about http://groups.google.com/group/openwferu-users/msg/501e9fa5f5a9c879 |
| 2010-05-09 04:08:05 utc | threetee | if I understand you correctly, it seems that I should be able to use 'participant :ashley, RuoteAMQP::Participant', yes? |
| 2010-05-09 04:08:30 utc | jmettraux | if RuoteAmqp::Participant is OK with it, yes |
| 2010-05-09 04:08:36 utc | jmettraux | if it's not OK, we have to upgrade it |
| 2010-05-09 04:08:38 utc | threetee | in the ruote-amqp rdocs, that is listed as an example |
| 2010-05-09 04:08:46 utc | jmettraux | ah great |
| 2010-05-09 04:08:47 utc | threetee | so I assume it supports it |
| 2010-05-09 04:09:40 utc | threetee | but wanted to check with you to see if you had made your statement based on reading the ruote-amqp participant code, or if it was a general statement about the way I was using the ruote-amqp participant |
| 2010-05-09 04:09:58 utc | jmettraux | :) |
| 2010-05-09 04:10:07 utc | threetee | sounds like it was the latter, so I'll rework my code and test it out :) |
| 2010-05-09 04:10:26 utc | jmettraux | more like "sorry I don't have the time to check ruote-amqp right now, but this is how it should work to comply with ruote 2.1.x" |
| 2010-05-09 04:10:50 utc | jmettraux | also a message towards Kenneth |
| 2010-05-09 04:11:12 utc | jmettraux | ruote-amqp is very important, if you want to take the lead, that's great |
| 2010-05-09 04:11:31 utc | threetee | I'll test it out to see if it works the way it should |
| 2010-05-09 04:11:47 utc | jmettraux | many thanks ! |
| 2010-05-09 04:54:21 utc | threetee | works! :) |
| 2010-05-09 04:56:13 utc | jmettraux | great ! |
| 2010-05-09 11:51:38 utc | der-dokctor | Hi |